We Should Suspend Prices For School Uniforms And Sell &Nbsp; Start Hearing To Clarify Reasons For Price Rise.

"So far, 5 enterprises have monopolized the school uniforms for 10 years. In the end, they lost money or made money. The Municipal Education Bureau has not publicized them. The enterprises have not been publicized. No one knows. This is a mystery. You said he was out of luck, and many colleagues said they were profiteering."

-- Wu Limin

"The rise in school uniform prices has aroused great public repercussions. School uniforms involve a lot of people's livelihood, and suddenly the price rises suddenly. But why should prices rise or how to make them scientific and reasonable?"

Wu Limin, a member of the Standing Committee of the Shenzhen Municipal People's Congress and the supervisor of the supervision department of the municipal government, said about the price rise of school clothes. Recently, he and many friends have been concerned about the progress of the incident. I hope all the departments concerned will disclose the details that they had not disclosed before. If necessary, they can introduce auditing, discipline inspection and supervision organs to investigate.

5 years after initial tendering

Direct extension of suspected violation

Wu Limin said that in the past 10 years, the city's uniforms of millions of students have been monopolized by 5 school uniform manufacturers.

As early as the expiration of the first tender, a new round of bidding should have been carried out. However, the education department at that time did not renew the bid. Instead, it renewed the contract with the 5 school uniform manufacturers for another 5 years.

"This is a serious violation of law."

Wu Limin said.

"Where there are clear laws and regulations, where the relevant departments have openly violated them, how should they be punished? Who should be held accountable? This is one thing in itself, and this time it has become so indistinct."

He believes that the municipal discipline inspection, supervision and other relevant departments can not investigate the reasons for bidding at that time, and this time.

5 school uniform factories for 10 years

Profit and loss is a mystery.

This school uniform price increases, the City Education Bureau has repeatedly indicated that because the school uniform manufacturers claimed that because of rising costs, operations are difficult to continue.

Wu Limin believes that the so-called loss of business argument, we must produce trustworthy data, otherwise it simply doesn't hold water.

"So far, 5 enterprises have monopolized the school uniforms for 10 years. In the end, they lost money or made money. The Municipal Education Bureau has not publicized them. The enterprises have not been publicized. No one knows. This is a mystery. You said he was out of luck, and many colleagues said they were profiteering."

Wu Limin said, these enterprises are not welfare agencies, if profits are not, as long as 5 years ago, when the qualification is postponed, there should be enterprises unable to continue to give up school uniform production.

Wu Limin said, did the Education Bureau really investigate and understand the real operation of the 5 enterprises over the past 10 years? Should enterprises take the initiative to make the profits and losses of the past 10 years dry out? Where is the deficit? The Municipal Education Bureau, as the responsible department, has always been ambiguous about some key problems of school uniform price rise, and has always been more speaking from the perspective of enterprises. This will damage the credibility of the government and should immediately coordinate the relevant departments to investigate the real operation of enterprises and stop the sale of school uniforms.

{page_break}

According to market rule

School uniform should be reduced now.

Wu Limin believes that the cost certification basis for this school price increase is based on the city price Certification Center last year.

Wu Limin said that the price fluctuation of the raw material market is a market rule, but for the industry, the price fluctuation within 1 years can not directly reflect the price fluctuation of the whole industry, nor can the cost be evaluated at the highest price of raw materials.

At least 3 years as a base point, from the winning bid to 3 years before the termination of the contract, it can truly reflect the changes in the cost of the enterprise.

"If we say that when the price is high, the cost of the enterprises will hang upside down, and the cost of raw materials will drop sharply in the near future. According to the market rule, the school uniform should be cut down according to the market rules."

Wu Limin said.

The price of school uniform must be increased.

School uniforms involve millions of students in Shenzhen. Wu Limin believes that uniforms should not be a commodity that can raise prices arbitrarily for students who have no financial resources. They should be strict, prudent and pparent.

For school uniform is not in the government price list, there is no need to hold a hearing, Wu Limin does not agree.

He held that it is necessary to hold a hearing session before the price rises.

School uniform is related to people's livelihood, especially for millions of students and millions of parents behind. The education department should actively request hearing from the perspective of parents. This is a responsible approach and a way to avoid passive situations afterwards.

It is very inappropriate to have no public hearing before price rises.

The increase should not be caused by

The layman's Department agreed.

In this regard, Wu Limin believes that the City Education Bureau, whether it is the operation of enterprises, the price of school uniform, or the bidding work, is a "layman" by the Municipal Education Bureau. It should invite price managers and other departments to make responsible calculations of these problems, rather than just a "countersign", and the price department is also responsible for making clear these problems, otherwise it will also be dereliction of duty.

"The price of the school uniform is tender through the municipal government procurement center. The price of the tender is rigid, and the bid price of the bidding enterprise must not be lower than the cost estimate price provided by the city price authentication center.

After bidding, the Municipal Education Bureau also held consultations with the successful bidder on the price issue, and finally determined that the increase was over 14%.

This is not authoritative in itself, it is unavoidable to make people suspicious. Besides, there are still some key problems that can not be explained clearly.

School uniform production should be marketization.

Wu Limin believes that clothing production in Shenzhen is very famous in China, and there are many large enterprises. But now there are not many school uniform production enterprises, and district monopolization. Uniformed manufacturers can easily reach an alliance of collective price increases, so the uniforms should be marketed.

The school uniform is not too complicated to manufacture, and the fabric is not rare. Because there are uniform styles and specific quality standards, the market is fully competitive. The quality of school uniforms can not only be improved, but also the price can reflect the real "marketization".

"Maybe not only do not raise prices, but it is possible for the public to buy school uniforms at half the price now."

Wu Limin said.

School uniforms should be temporarily suspended.

Wu Limin believes that the rise in school uniforms has caused widespread public dissatisfaction. Since the public opinion is so large and the attention is very high, and there is no convincing response, the education department can not do nothing. It is time to stop selling the school uniforms, and assess the real business situation of the enterprises by the Department of price management, carry out scientific and reasonable market research, recalculate the cost of school uniforms, and decide whether the school uniform should rise in price. If so, what is the reasonable price increase?

He stressed that the process of re investigation and re pricing must be open and pparent so that the public can take part in testimony. It will be clear and pparent, for example, by holding price hearings, inviting students, parents, manufacturers and people from all walks of life to engage in communication talks. Before the price adjustment, a press conference must be held, drying out all processes and accepting questions from the media.

He also reiterated to reporters many times that the role of the education sector is to serve students and speak for students rather than unilaterally for enterprises.

Even if the procedure of this tender is not a problem, some key problems such as the extent of price increase, the cost of enterprises, and the quality of school uniform are not clear. Therefore, the Municipal Education Bureau should act as soon as possible and win the trust of the people.

"If the Municipal Education Bureau and other departments are still afraid of the public's doubts, we can invite the audit, supervision and discipline inspection departments to intervene in the investigation."

Wu Limin said.

{page_break}

Han Jinhua, deputy to the Municipal People's Congress

The price of school uniform has increased, but if the quality fails to catch up, it will lose the meaning of re tendering.

Before the price increases, the city education bureau did not give an open and pparent explanation of the reasons for the rise in school uniform prices and their gains.

In fact, the City Board of education itself has the responsibility and obligation to require the school uniform manufacturers to disclose their operating costs, explain where they are losing, how much the price increases can relieve the pressure of enterprises, and so on. They can not control themselves.

It is very unreasonable to make cost certification during the period of last year's most expensive school uniform.

Even if the market is priced, it is more accurate to choose at least the average price of raw materials for 10 years.

Zhu Shunhua, executive vice chairman of the municipal CPPCC Committee and City Watch Industry Association

There are many reasons for the loss of enterprises. Raw materials are only one aspect, and also include the management and other aspects of enterprises.

Enterprises will control costs according to these factors, and ultimately affect product prices.

The school uniform wins the bidding, and says no money, then it will not participate in the bidding.

From a personal point of view, the price of school uniform is not in favor. The current school uniform in Shenzhen has a big gap with Hongkong in terms of style, design and quality.

I am also a student parent. The quality of school uniforms is not good at all.

As for the loss of the enterprise, it is purely a matter of enterprise management. It is easy to make money in a loss account. It can not be said that a business is called a deficit government, and the price rises.

If a company fails to make a profit, a sample survey will show that the competent department of education can organize CPPCC members and Shenzhen apparel industry practitioners to take part in the investigation and evaluate the bid winning enterprises. The result is more fair.

In addition, it is proposed to hold hearings to invite parents, students, CPPCC members, NPC deputies and practitioners in the apparel industry to participate.

Zhang Yuqiang, Deputy Secretary General of the Shenzhen Municipal Committee of the Democratic League of China

Bidding should consider quality and price, if setting a minimum bid price, it is against market principles and tendering intention.

Generally speaking, tendering is a requirement to carry out under this requirement. For example, the style, quality and workmanship of garments are the tender of qualified enterprises. From the market point of view, the best quality matching lowest price is the result of bidding selection.

But it is obviously not appropriate for the city education department to give a minimum price when bidding.

You didn't invite tenders. How do you know which price is the lowest price?

In the management link of school uniform, we should not adopt the way of market segmentation, resulting in the fact of monopoly. Instead, we should liberalize the market, choose freely by the students and parents, and finally let the market return to the market, and the government will return to the government.

Jin Yan, a lawyer of the Oriental Jin Yuan law office:

It is stipulated that an enterprise can only manage a certain area, and can not be operated across the region. This is a regional monopoly, and eventually there is no market competition.

It's like there are many restaurants in Shenzhen, but if you operate in Fukuda, you will not be allowed to cross the area to operate in Nanshan or Luohu. Isn't that ridiculous? Without market competition, the market will be no longer viable.

With fierce market competition, there will be no "hidden rules" and there will be no more room for personal gain.

In terms of tendering, it should not be bidding from the platform of the municipal government procurement center, but should adopt the form of price hearing.

The project bidding by the government procurement center should be a financial allocation, the purchase of goods is used by the government, and users do not have to pay for it by themselves.

But school uniform is different, the purchase of school uniform is not a financial allocation, and it needs to be paid by parents.

Therefore, bidding for school uniform should involve parents and listen to the opinions of parents.

Since the government does not pay for school uniforms, parents should buy them, and in the entire procurement bidding process, it shields parents' opinions. This is a violation of parents' right to know and to choose.

Yang Lixun, director of the Institute of social development, Shenzhen Academy of Social Sciences

There are millions of primary and secondary school students in Shenzhen. This is a group of such large numbers, which represents the future of the city. Students wear this dress almost every day. Therefore, school uniform is definitely our city's "business card". Don't dirty it.

School uniforms are essential and sensitive to countless families. The departments concerned should be cautious about their price and quality management and protect the interests of the students. At present, Shenzhen has implemented the bidding system for the production of school uniforms, and the cost of raw material procurement, labor and factory rent of school uniform production enterprises should be completely open to the public.

Zhou Mingming, deputy to the Municipal People's Congress

The rising price of school uniform has caused widespread dissatisfaction among the public. Its core point is that the school uniform enterprises have not clearly explained the factors such as labor and raw materials involved in the price increase to the public.

Not only because uniforms are items in the non-government pricing catalogue, they avoid the public hearings, such as hearings, which evade the right to know and participation of students and their parents related to school uniforms.

There are millions of primary and secondary school students in Shenzhen. One student has to buy several school uniforms, and the number of school uniforms is tens of millions.

In view of such a huge special population, it is very necessary to conduct a hearing before the price rises.