Seven Points For Attention In Official Document Writing

First, copy it. Now there are some places to implement superiors. file It is not based on the reality of the locality or department, but on the basis of the effect. This is a very irresponsible attitude. The documents of higher authorities are addressed in a certain scope. Generally speaking, asking questions and solving problems are generally considered. Some special situations in some places can not be taken care of, and solutions to some problems can not be very specific. This requires that the lower level organs and units must put forward specific implementation opinions according to the principles and spirits stipulated in the higher level documents and the actual conditions of the local authorities and departments. As a leading comrade has pointed out, every level is not simply a matter of implementation, but also has the dual nature of initiative and passivity, that is, the instructions to the Central Committee must be resolutely implemented, and in the process of execution, the mobility of the problem depends on its own actual conditions, and the initiative is sought in the passive. Otherwise, it will never get a good result if the documents of the superior are copied in a straight line, "up and down" or "one-sided understanding".

Two. No teacher. To put forward a point of view or to put forward a policy should be well known and justified. This is mainly based on the party's line and policy. policy And national laws, regulations and instructions from higher authorities. It goes without saying that the implementation of the central deployment is mainly based on the central documents. In accordance with the actual needs of deployment, we should also pay attention to theoretical basis and document basis. That is to say, put the opinions put forward in the political pattern at that time to consider, so that the views put forward are not only realistic, but also conform to the requirements of the political structure at that time. Another point is that the central government used to have instructions on the same issue. Recently, according to the new situation and tasks, the central government has made new instructions. When drawing up documents, the new instructions should be used as the basis for deployment. The Party committee is overall in its work and involves a lot of work. The documents issued by the party are also related to the corresponding aspects. Therefore, comrades who are working on drafting official documents are very much in need of strengthening the study of all kinds of documents, leading comrades' speech and knowledge in all fields, so as to grasp more basis and scale. According to the mastery of the scale and the accuracy of the measurement, the drafting of the documents is handy.

Three. Shoot at random. In order to solve problems, official documents must be targeted. Otherwise, it will not have any practical effect. In the article "eight Party of opposition", Mao Zedong listed the third criminal charges of "eight parties without a target," and in this part skillfully used an allusion, saying, "casting pearls before swine" is the object of ridicule. If we remove this meaning and put in the meaning of respecting the object, we will only have the meaning of sneering at the piano player. Why do we not watch the object play a single game? "Draft documents must also overcome this problem and pay attention to its pertinence. It is hard to imagine that an untargeted official document can impress people, influence people and promote work. In this sense, pertinence and maneuverability are the signs of "weight" in official documents. In order to enhance the weight of official documents and achieve a definite goal, we should first do well the investigation and study before drafting. It is clear that the problem is clear enough to know where to go, to talk about problems and to put forward countermeasures. Only after comparing and demonstrating policies and measures, can they be feasible and practical in practical work.

Four. Changes in order. according to Marx main From the point of view of righteousness, nothing is invariable. Policy is the same, and it should change with time, place and condition. But policy has relative stability and continuity, and this stability and continuity are directly related to the overall stability and career development. As we usually say, policy is stable and stable, and people's stability is stable. Therefore, when drawing up official documents, we must consider the issue from the height of politics and overall situation, and pay attention to maintaining the continuity and stability of policies. To do this, it is necessary to examine two aspects: first, check the basic spirit of the document, and conflict with the principles, policies, laws and decrees of the party and the state, as well as the resolutions, orders and instructions of the higher authorities. If there is any conflict, we should resolutely change it. The two is to check whether the relevant regulations issued by the same organ are contradictory. If there is any contradiction, we should seriously analyze it. If it is to supplement and perfect the original policy, we must make it clear that we must not allow people to have misunderstandings of "policy change". If we think that the previous regulations really need to be amended or abolished, we should ask the parties concerned to carry out research and demonstration.

Five. The language is inaccurate. The wording must be accurate, which is the basic requirement for drafting official documents. Judging whether the official document is accurate is mainly based on whether the concept is clear, and whether the judgment or inference is right. Therefore, when we abstract something in an abstract way, we must first clarify the facts and then judge and reason, so as to accurately reflect the objective reality. For example, the evaluation should be appropriate, neither exaggerating nor narrowing. If we analyze the causes of the problem, we should be objective, realistic, accurate and accurate, and point out the main sticking point of the problem; when it comes to "two relations", we must distinguish the primary and secondary issues while preventing the one-sided nature. In addition, the work should be meticulous to avoid "bruising" due to carelessness. For example, we should pay attention to the provenance and authority of the quoted words; we should pay attention to the consistency between the summary and deployment parts of the same question; if there is any doubt, we should actively communicate with the parties concerned, consult them, and make sure that the problems are clear; we should pay attention to verification and accuracy for some important situations and data. {page_break}

Six. The length is too long. Too long is a common problem in many local and departmental documents. In the war years, comrade Mao Zedong once put forward, "we should study how to write short and write more essays". Although this is not the war era, all levels of work are very busy and under great pressure. There are many kinds of documents and briefs. If we are to show you too long papers, this is undoubtedly "adding insult to injury". Therefore, it is necessary to advocate writing short passages. To compress space, it is very important to have "quality" consciousness. After taking the first draft of the document, it is necessary to deliberate word by word and sentence by sentence, delete the dispensable words, words and sentences, simplify the disgusting remark, wipe out the bullshit, the stereotype and the nonsense without practical significance, and strive to do well both in politics and in writing.

Seven. Nothing is out of order. In contrast, things are orderly. Having things in order is the two basic requirement for ancient writers to write articles. "Having something" means content, and order is organized. Now there are two flaws in some official documents. For example, some manuscripts only ask questions, and only say some principles about how to solve them. Some of the manuscripts are full of content. Several meanings are expressed in a paragraph level. These two problems should be corrected. Fan Wenlan, a historian, once advocated "sitting on the bench for ten years." We should learn this spirit and do our best to write the documents in real terms. Only in this way can we get the results that are easy to grasp and implement. At the same time, we should pay attention to the logicality and rationality of official documents. There is such a phenomenon in practical work: some well written documents, though they are longer in length, attract people to read, which makes people never tire of their long work. A very important difference is whether the content is coherent and whether the language is fluent. From this, we can see that the order of official documents is readable.