Workplace Compromise: Give Way Instead Of Attitude.

< p > for a long time in the workplace, people will naturally become mature.

An important sign of maturity is that you gradually understand that the purpose of your job is to make things happen, and it doesn't matter much whether it is in your favorite gesture or in the way others advocate.

< /p >

< p > to give way, not to attitude, is the starting point for resolving any differences.

< /p >

< p > narrow meet.

Obviously, the width of the alley is only enough for a car to go through, and someone must make concessions.

< /p >

< p > the road sign clearly indicates that this is a one-way street.

So the car that goes direct is right and sound: you violate the rules, naturally you have to reverse the car.

The one who was retrograde turned out to be angry: he was about to cross the road. When you came in, he saw how I couldn't let it happen. I wouldn't retreat. What could I do? /p

< p > 10 minutes, deadlock.

< /p >

< p > this is the scene I saw with my own eyes the other day.

This scene makes me feel familiar, not on the road, but in the workplace.

< /p >

Which one is better than the P plan A and the plan B? Who is the way of thinking of the project report? Whose opinion is the right way? The style of the LOGO is concise and bright or solemn atmosphere? A staff change, a rule making, a market trade-offs...

As long as there are people, there are bound to be disagreements.

< /p >

< p > workplace, most of the time there is no clear distinction between right and wrong.

Everyone has their own standpoints and standpoints. Simple "obedience to the majority" is not always effective and no one can easily win the qualification of one vote to veto other opinions.

At this point, if we want to push things forward smoothly, proper compromise will become the only feasible way.

< /p >

< p > my friend told me such a thing.

The contract customer of the company suddenly proposed to change the cooperation plan, the basic intention remained unchanged, but the specific procedures need to be adjusted.

But the little girl who was in charge of the client insisted that the contract was signed and there was room for change.

In fact, a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > Customer < /a > is also very difficult, and the high-level opinions are not unified. Finally, the boss has to go out and cling to the board, but this "board" is not quite the same as before.

< /p >

< p > no matter how people explain it, the girls are very hard to say: Why did you go there? How can we say that we can change the good things? Our company is already implementing the contract. What about the loss? < /p >

There is no word "compromise" in the dictionary in the P era of high spirited youth.

At that time, insisting on one's own opinions was a proof of strength and existence: I did right, my opinion was better, and why should I compromise? Like those two cars in the alley, no one would give up half a step.

< /p >

< p > but in the workplace, people will naturally mature.

An important sign of maturity is that you gradually understand that the purpose of your job is to make things happen, and it doesn't matter much whether it is in your favorite gesture or in the way others advocate.

< /p >

< p > compromise is a low cost, high benefit, < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > workplace strategy < /a >. Its significance lies in ensuring the realization of fundamental interests and fundamental principles by non essential interests and fundamental principles, in other words, losing the job and protecting the car.

< /p >

< p > > meeting each other with courage is a battle between two armies.

However, in the workplace, more often than not, what we need is cooperation rather than confrontation, which is to solve problems rather than intensify contradictions.

At this time, softness is often more effective than rigid.

< /p >

The negotiations reached a deadlock following the closing of several rounds of P.

The customer even gave a tough talk: if so, we won't play.

Girls also feel wronged. Every step of their execution is strictly carried out according to the procedures. Why is the relationship between the two sides nearly broken? < /p >

< p > the friend who told this story later was sent to clean up the mess by "a href=" http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp "boss" /a ".

He soon discovered that there were no problems in the two sides' cooperation intentions and cooperation bases, but there were some differences in the specific operational aspects.

< /p >

< p > friends do not directly inform customers or not, but in the mail lists the common interests and differences existing in this cooperation, and put forward several new solutions by combining various opinions.

After a few rounds, the client accepted the new plan, and the two sides gave each other a step to revise the contract.

< /p >

P, many times, things are not either or Yes. There are thousands of possibilities between Yes and No.

If you iron heart to be brave, persist in discerning who is right and who is wrong, the result is likely to be both sides.

Later, friends concluded that the girl put all her attention on the execution of the contract, which is understandable. But she forgot that the core goal of the company is to keep the customers and do the business well.

< /p >

P is easier said than done, but when things happen, many people are in a hurry.

Just like the two drivers in a narrow alley, don't they understand that gambling is not an end? It's a good thing to hurry home. /p

< p >, so when you suddenly fall into some kind of disagreement, you must not rush to say no.

Try to find out if there are third ways to use "if you can see if you can do that" instead of "I have to do this, I can't help it". Maybe we can find a way that both sides can accept.

< /p >