The Key To Wechat'S Black Door Is How To Make Fake News.

< p > < span style= "font-size: 12px" > here the world's < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/" target= "_blank" > dress > /a > < target= > "" "" "" ">" shoes "> hat net" Xiaobian "is introduced as home textiles" WeChat smear black door "key in the false news how to qualitative.

< /span > < /p >.

"P", "home textile three swordsmen" rolls, Meng Jie and fuanna "WeChat wipe the black door" in the battle of saliva that you came to me, evolved into the most popular topic in the home textile industry recently, attracting media attention and spectator eyeball.

But through these lively appearances, it is necessary to clarify the truth and let the readers see the "doorway" so as to avoid being misled or led by the nose.

< /p >

< p > in fact, there are three aspects in the whole event: the WeChat platform is an official or a copycat; is the content discredited? Is the news happening on the WeChat platform, occurring in the 3.15 period? < /p >

< p > the first thing to stir up trouble is Luo Lai home textile and fuanna home textile.

After 3.15 this year, Luo Lai home textile platform, Wenling Luo Lai home textile, Tianjin Luo Lai home textile, and Changning fuanna home textiles use the special attention of consumers on product quality. On March 17th and 18, they released the news on the unqualified home textiles product "3.15 home textile unqualified brand, and see if your bed is qualified." the focus is on criticizing the quality of the dream home textiles, causing widespread concern among consumers.

In early May, Meng Jie home textile held a press conference calling for an apology from Luo Lai home textiles and fuanna home textiles.

After hearing news from Roley home textiles, he actively communicated with Meng Jie home textiles, and the two sides reached a settlement. Jiang Tianwu, chairman of Meng Jie home textile, said he wanted to "relax matters" and shook hands with Roley.

However, as a supporting actor, fuanna not only did not apologize, but jumped out and borrowed the media to prosecute Meng Jie home textiles.

In May 27th, Meng Jie held a news release again, saying that he was not afraid of trouble, and that if fuanna did his own way, he had to countercharge fuanna and stay with him to the end.

< /p >

< p > from now on, the confrontation between the two sides is magnified to their own advantage, and their disadvantage is selectively overlooked.

< /p >

< p > fuanna claims that "Changning fuanna" is not directly related to it.

For fuanna's ambiguously confusing, the dream of home textiles is obviously not confused. Her suggestion is that fuanna should make public the identity of "Changning fuanna".

Like Changning, Fu Anna is a distributor of Fu An's subordinates. The headquarters should deal with the obligation of supervision and management of distributors. Distributors have the behavior of disrupting market order and damage the reputation of other companies.

If Changning fuanna does not belong to the distributor of fuanna, fuanna does not have jurisdiction over it. Meng Jie home textile recommends that the relevant departments of fuanna take the fight against fake products, and is willing to lend a helping hand to help them.

< /p >

< p > > Meng Jie < a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_c.asp" > Home Textiles < /a > said, Tencent WeChat certification has strict procedures, registered micro signal, if there is no proof material, it can not be registered, even if the distributor's micro signal, fuanna has the right and obligation of supervision.

Hong Shibin, a producer, believes that it is possible to make such a hypothesis: if fuanna thinks that Changning fuanna is not his own, he should actively provide relevant evidence to Tencent, and send a letter asking Tencent to delete the micro signal.

If the Tencent does not delete the micro signal after receiving the evidence, Tencent should bear the corresponding responsibility instead of Meng Jie. If you want to sue Meng Jie home textiles, will you first tell Tencent or take the Tencent with you? < /p >

< p > about the content of the blackened.

Meng Jie home textile says the content is virtual. As a source of red net, it published similar news in September 16, 2013, but it was deleted because of the false report.

There must be no relevant content before and after 3.15 this year.

Fuanna is a blind eye to time, which means that the quality problems of the dream home textile products have been reported by the media.

The relevant media also scratched the so-called evidence, which is the quality problem of "a product packaging box is inconsistent with the certificate and the label of durability".

But it's not news, it's old news.

About time.

Now it is certain that there will be no news of the unqualified quality of the home textile products during the 3.15 period of this year.

And the spread of WeChat on the platform of Luo Lai and Anna Anna is now certainly the content of being moved.

Hong Shibin believes that it is terrible to use such old news to discredit competitors. If so, the old news of every enterprise can be moved out and become a sharp weapon to attack competitors. It is easy to confuse the public, and cause the panic and market competition of consumers to be unordered, which should be banned.

Timeliness is the essential element of news, as is the factual authenticity of news. This kind of news that arbitrarily distort time is, of course, false news.

< /p >

< p > at present, nine ministries and commissions such as the Central Propaganda Department are jointly attacking a href= "http://www.91se91.com/news/index_s.asp" > fake news > /a >.

Hong Shibin believes that such acts of committing crimes against the wind should also be prohibited.

Otherwise, competitors will be able to turn the old calendar of the other side into the name of "news" to attack their opponents. Will it not be chaotic? Never mind. There is a lot of negativity about fuanna. If the dream of home textiles turns out the old news as a weapon of attack, how can fuanna feel? < /p >