Talent Standards For Talent Selection And Retention

As for the specific criteria for measuring talents, people all agree highly on both ability and integrity.

Both ability and integrity are known as "the first standard of employing people for thousands of years".

Its essence is to require all actions of employees to be virtuous and talented, both of them must be combined.

Wei Zheng stressed in particular that if "Germany" can not be considered too much during the war, then "chaos is not equal, but it is not available."

Tang Taizong added "knowledge" and said: "today's appointment must be based on virtue and knowledge."

In the Ming Dynasty, Liu Bin believed that those who held important positions should not only have both ability and integrity, but also must have the measure. "The so-called quantity can be well spoken, and the talented person can be tolerated.

Wang Fuzhi, in addition to talent and quantity, plus "willpower", thinks that the ability of success can only be seen in terms of how to see the amount of things, and the size of the audience.

The four key elements of the standard of talent are: mind (quantity), moral character (character), ability (knowledge + ability) and will (inverse quotient).

We put our hearts first.

The mind decides the success or failure of the career and the height of life. The highest standard of people is the first standard of measurement. The middle end is the first standard of measurement, and the lowest is the first criterion.

Niu Gensheng, founder of Mengniu, said: "General Secretary Hu Jintao said he was concentrating on building and developing with one heart and one mind."

The implementation of the enterprise is concentrating on production, wholeheartedly doing marketing, and a production man. His talent standard is to make products like consumers all over the country. If he is concerned about the liberation of Afro Latin slaves, he will analyze the dynamics of the Iraq war for a moment, and then study the crustal movement of the Pacific (601099, stock bar).

No one likes to eat ice cream, but he is not the right post.

Talent is the right person for a suitable place at the right time. Talking about talents from the post is like leaving the spear and talking about the shield.

I think from the micro perspective, the standards of talents follow the following four basic elements:

Paying attention to contribution (value): talent and wealth.

No matter how profound professional knowledge and experience it is, it is meaningless to create value or increase output of resources.

Tang Jun is known as "working emperor" not only because of ability and talent, but mainly because personal salary is higher than others, and the higher salary is due to the value of creation.

Pay attention to implementation (results): good people always like to say two sentences: (1) boss, no problem, give it to me; (2) boss, things have been completely solved.

It is important, but more important than attitude, is whether the result of doing things satisfies the leadership.

Embrace

The ability is important, but if there is no sense of responsibility or responsibility, it will affect the final result of the matter.

In the face of responsibility should not be, only willing to solve the problem first, accountability second.

First class employees find ways to make excuses.

Be good at

(Progress): savvy is good, and good at timely summing up, usually active learning and consulting.

For example, Lenovo's talent standards are: common beliefs and values; loyalty and sacrifice spirit; the ability to assess the situation and the ability to act independently; the ability to manage teams and teams; unite the majority and coordinate the ability of cooperation; and study hard and tirelessly.

In short, to treat talents, we should speak more about the level of diplomas, more professional titles, more professional speaking experience, more qualifications, more dedication, moral and style.