Zhengzhou Good Document Creation Competition Held Final

The 3 finals, which lasted 9 hours, completed a commonly used official document and two material compositions.

In from November 22nd to 23rd, the final of the good document creation competition held in Zhengzhou in 2014 was held at the municipal technician college, and 396 athletes were selected through the unit selection.

It is understood that

The good document creation competition in 2014 was launched in the whole city in recent years.

The largest and most competitive official document contest.

A total of 2023 competitors from 79 municipal units and 11 counties (cities) and 4 dispatched agencies entered the competition.

This time

It is a comprehensive test for the contestants after the preliminary and semi-finals training. After the end of the finals, the contestants who have achieved excellent results in the finals will be commended in the whole city.

Related links:

Duan Yuping, deputy director of the Copyright Administration Department of the State Copyright Administration, also said that when judicial decisions or administrative treatments have a greater impact on a certain mode of operation, we must be especially cautious. We should take into account the development of the whole industry while handling cases.

At present, in the aspect of network video sharing, the copyright duty of uploading works is clear.

However, in the field of written works, how to identify the tort liability of the network platform, whether in judicial practice or in administrative law enforcement, is still in the exploratory stage.

Duan Yuping believes that to determine an information storage space does not constitute infringement, the content of video can be judged from the popularity of the works, and for word works, judging from popularity is not easy.

However, in judicial practice, there is a method that may be used for reference, that is, whether the works of alleged infringement were published by regular publishing houses.

If a netizen uploads a regular publication to the space through the sharing platform, then the sharing platform should know that this behavior may be unauthorized.

Why? From the point of view of publishers, it is unlikely that an ordinary netizen can be authorized to share their publications through an open platform.

After obtaining the authorization of the obligee, the publisher invested a lot of manpower, material and financial resources for editing and processing books.

Allowing users to share the free platform will result in loss of interest.

Duan Yuping emphasized that copyright focuses on the principle of technological neutrality, but now the traditional right people feel helpless and helpless about the rapid mass dissemination of the Internet.

Under such circumstances, the court tends to "vulnerable groups". In the traditional media and new media, the traditional publishing houses are relatively weak, and the "red flag" principle is defined, or the standard of fault is adopted. The court has adopted a relatively strict way to the Internet platform, which is understandable.