Overcome The "Three Only" Tendency And Break Away The Confusion Of Professional Titles

The academic level is too high to be able to judge a professor without publishing his thesis. In recent years, only academic qualifications, qualifications and thesis have increasingly become the focus of our professional title system.

The general office of the CPC Central Committee and the general office of the State Council recently issued the "opinions on deepening the reform of the title system", and carried out a major reform of the system involving more than 5500 000 professional and technical personnel. Professional title is not only related to personal income and promotion, but also regarded as a yardstick for evaluating personal business level and contribution.

The system of professional titles in China mainly experienced the appointment of technical posts in the mid 60s of the first century, the evaluation of professional titles from 1977 to 1983, and the appointment of professional and technical posts since 1986. The current title system consists of 29 professional titles, including scientific research, engineering, agriculture, health and teachers.

Zhou Tianyong, a professor at the Central Party school, said that the establishment of the title system played an important role in motivating, selecting and training professional and technical personnel. However, as time goes on, some indicators which are not related to professional skills are also included in the evaluation index system. In some places and units, professional titles sometimes become. talented persons The fetters that stand out.

Taking the foreign language examination as an example, it has been questioned for more than 20 years with "one size fits all" and "chicken ribs". It has been reported that a writer has published several million words of reportage, novels and essays, and has won many awards. However, due to failing to pass foreign language and computer examinations, he has been unable to get a secondary high school title (grade two writer).

In addition, as the "stepping stone" of professional title assessment, the foreign language examination of professional titles has become the swing of some institutions and individuals, and Qian Shu has bred all kinds of chaos.

Before the exam, all kinds of "Bao Guo" training information were flying all over the world, some training classes even openly instruct cheating; in the exam, cheating on behalf of the examination, transmission of test questions and so on were banned repeatedly; after the examination, the institutions that knew the candidates' personal accurate information claimed that they could "modify the results online".

Now, the opinion is clear: there is no uniform requirement for foreign language and computer application proficiency test. It is really necessary to evaluate the foreign language and computer level independently by the employing unit or the accreditation body.

In addition to foreign languages and computer examinations, there are many bright points in the opinion. One of the basic principles is to overcome the tendency of academic qualifications, qualifications and thesis.

Southwest University of Political Science and Law professor Cheng Dean pointed out that in Colleges and universities, the only paper has become a rigid requirement: university teachers, whether professional titles or promotions, often focus only on the number of papers published, and whether they are conscientious or not can only be "conscientious".

Regardless of the characteristics of the industry, the academic qualifications, qualifications, papers and other standards are quantified as "hard bars" for professional titles evaluation, forcing professional and technical personnel to spend a lot of material, financial and energy outside the professional technology for the title assessment, resulting in huge waste of human resources.

Cheng Dean believes that this kind of talent evaluation standard is obviously not in line with the requirements of the times, and even become a sharp obstacle for sluggish professionals. Especially those professionals who are stunt, can not be applied by professional titles, and lose the interests of the industry, society and even the state.

For this reason, the opinion emphasizes the professionalism, technology, practicality and creativity of professional and technical personnel on the basis of occupational attributes and job demands. Innovation ability Evaluation; focus on assessing professional and technical personnel to perform their job responsibilities, performance and innovation.

Tang Tao, Vice Minister of the Ministry of human resources and social security, believes that the promulgation and implementation of the "opinions" can release and stimulate professional and technical personnel to create and create new businesses to the maximum extent, expand the professional development space of professional talents, continuously improve the level of talent supply in China, and enhance the overall strength and international competitiveness of talents.

Some local professional titles adopt the policy of "repaying more and less", which makes teachers very worried. "For example, if 15 of the 100 teachers in our school are senior titles, the proportion required is 10%, so there will be no more indicators." A principal in Huaihua, Hunan, said that for a period of 5 years, schools had no targets.

Experts believe that a high threshold, a small number of places, administrative power to participate in the title. Evaluation system Not only does it hurt a teacher, it even has an impact on the entire faculty. "When it comes to indicators, teachers will not unite. In order to get high marks, some teachers will not hesitate to go to extremes."

In terms of innovating the evaluation mechanism of professional titles, the opinions put forward the establishment of an industry evaluation mechanism based on peer review and appraise special talents through special ways. Encourage qualified areas to set up a professional title evaluation committee or a review group separately, and separate them.

In improving the service mode of professional titles management, the opinions put forward the leading role of the employing body in the evaluation of professional titles, scientifically defined and reasonably delegated the right of evaluation of professional titles.

Experts believe that this requires more attention to the fairness, impartiality and openness in the evaluation of professional titles, and procedural justice. We should work out a multi-dimensional assessment scale that fits the professional characteristics and objectively reflects personal achievements. At the same time, decentralization must give full play to the role of the government, strengthen supervision and management, combine management and discharge, earnestly safeguard the fairness and impartiality of professional title assessment, severely crack down on academic fraud and corruption, and maintain clear space for professional title assessment.

In short, professional titles should not be a "obstacle" to restrict talents, but should be a "booster" to promote the talents' ability, personal value and social value.

For more information, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats and Internet cafes.