The US Export Regulation Will Reject China.

US Commerce Secretary Luo Jiahui recently issued a new US export control policy, the "exceptions to strategic trade licensing", which excludes China from the 44 enjoyment.

Worried that China has robbed the US market.

China is the third largest export destination country in the United States. Data show that China has been the fastest growing export market in the United States for 9 consecutive years.

Last year, US exports increased by 2%, of which exports to China increased by 50%.

It is predicted that the total volume of Sino US trade will increase to 450 billion US dollars in 2011.

Insiders said that the two sides should further strengthen mutually beneficial and win-win partnership, which will benefit the two countries and the two peoples.

Why did the US refuse to relax its export control to China?

Bai Ming, a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce, said in an interview with our reporter that in fact, the United States has been restricting exports to China.

In the past, the Cold War mentality existed mainly in the US, and believed that if China possessed high technology, it would be used for military affairs.

Now, the United States is more worried that China has acquired advanced technology, will compete with the US industry, and consider more business factors.

They believe that China is making great efforts.

Song Hong, director of the World Trade Research Institute of the Institute of international economics and politics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, said that the issue of export control has been deeply rooted in US history, and it is difficult for China to relax in the short term.

"Since you don't want me to import, I encourage myself to produce."

Song Hong suggested that China could form checks and balances with the United States in terms of independent research and development, intellectual property protection and so on.

Self contradictory

In fact, the United States does not relax its export control to China, and ultimately it hurts itself.

Bai Ming said that trade protectionism in the United States has become increasingly impracticable in the increasingly globalized economy.

Because each country has its own advantages and characteristics, interrelated and dependent.

If the restrictions on exports to China are really implemented, it will be difficult for China to cooperate in certain aspects, and China will turn to other ways.

"On the one hand, the United States emphasizes the deficit in trade with China, on the other hand, it restricts exports to China, and it is a kind of paradoxical logic and practice to deny Chinese enterprises access to relevant trade facilitation."

Yao Jian sharply pointed out that restricting exports to China would first lead to a sustained trade deficit between the United States and China.

According to China's Ministry of commerce data, in 2010, the volume of China's import and export trade was close to US $3 trillion, and the total trade surplus was US $183 billion 100 million, of which the US surplus was US $181 billion 300 million, which accounted for about 99% of the total, and China's trade surplus with other countries was almost zero.

Chen Deming, Minister of Commerce, analyzed the main reasons for the Sino US trade imbalance. He pointed out that the United States had trade discrimination against China. The United States had always had sanctions against China. Military products were prohibited from exporting to China. The two items of military and civilian products were also strictly examined and approved before exporting to China.

In fact, restricting exports to China will ultimately hurt the interests of American enterprises.

Yao Jian said that US exports to China increased rapidly in recent years, but high technology products lagged far behind agricultural products.

China's vast market has created enormous business opportunities for us enterprises to expand their exports to China. Unreasonable export control policies have restricted trade development between the two countries, and directly damaged the interests of American enterprises and reduced employment opportunities in the United States.

The China Chamber of Commerce has called on the United States to pass the existing one.

Chen Deming has said that if the US side can gradually remove obstacles to high-tech exports to China, American enterprises can also have a fair access to China's big market at the moment of high financial crisis and high unemployment rate.

The United States violates its many commitments.

The United States began to comprehensively assess the current export control system in August 2009, and formally launched the reform of export control system in August 31st last year.

As a key restricting country for export control in the US, China has been paying great attention to the reform, and has repeatedly appealed to the US side to relax its export control to China and promote bilateral trade balance on occasions such as bilateral strategic dialogue.

The United States has repeatedly promised that it is considering easing the long-standing export restrictions on high-tech products in Sino US trade.

Luo Jiahui has said that some high-tech products that the United States restrictive exports to China based on security considerations has been very open all over the world, which makes the regulation meaningless.

Therefore, the United States is reviewing such a "export control" policy.

However, the new US Strategic Trade License

Yao Jian also once again called for relaxation of export control to China, which has always been a major concern of China.

It is hoped that the US side can take concrete actions to effectively implement the Sino US strategic and economic dialogue and the consensus reached by the China US Joint Commission on commerce and trade, change the visual practice of China, promote the substantive development of Sino US high technology trade, and promote the Sino US trade balance.