The Reflection Triggered By The "Qitaihe Case" Has Just Begun.

At 10 a.m. on December 22, 2007, the relevant departments of the higher people's Court of Heilongjiang province telegraphed reporters that the people's Court of Qitaihe Xinxing district made a public judgment on the "11. 27" mine accident on the same day, and sentenced the defendant to imprisonment for three years and six months to six years in a serious accident.

The mining accident has been going on for more than 700 days.

If 171 lives are known underground, they can finally rest in peace.

From November this year, the 23 Japanese daily first disclosed that "the Qitaihe mine disaster happened nearly two years ago, and no one has been investigated for criminal responsibility" until sentencing. In just one month, the case has the trial result. Is the work efficiency of the public security, procuratorial and court departments high or low?

After the publication of the news that the Qitaihe mine disaster happened two years ago and no one has been prosecuted for criminal responsibility, all circles of the society pay close attention to it.

In December 20th, the director general of the State Administration of work safety, Li Yizhong, said at the news conference held by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the reason for the delay of the case is that the provincial level is implemented. The Qitaihe municipal Party committee and the municipal government themselves have said that they did not attach enough importance to the work, and that the coordination between the public security and procuratorial departments was not very active.

At the same time, Li Yizhong helped people to sort out the twists and turns in the implementation of responsibilities.

The mine accident occurred in Qitaihe in November 27, 2005 and the responsible person was controlled since December 7th.

In July 19, 2006, the 144th executive meeting of the State Council passed the investigation report on the Qitaihe coal mine accident, and agreed to pfer the 11 responsible persons to the judicial organs.

In August 1, 2006, the state coal Supervision Bureau pferred the accident investigation report to the Heilongjiang Provincial People's government according to the procedure. At the same time, the Ministry of Supervision issued a notice calling for the implementation of Party discipline and disciplinary action of the responsible party.

In August 11th, the governor's instructions were led by the Provincial Department of supervision and 7 departments took part in the treatment, and 4 requests were put forward.

In the late November of this year, when the "Qitaihe mine accident happened two years ago and no one was held accountable", the Heilongjiang provincial government and the Qitaihe municipal government attached great importance to it. On the one hand, the organizer identified the cause and accelerated the handling of the case.

Finally, the result of the first instance sentencing in December 22nd.

In fact, simply looking at the "Qitaihe case" from a certain angle, we can also say that one does not pay much attention to, one does not take the initiative and the other is not well coordinated, so that the implementation of the case responsibility has been dragged on and dragged on for two years, and there has been no news in the past two years. Then, we attach great importance to it, take the initiative and coordinate effectively, so the first instance of the case set up a local record of 18.5 hours of continuous trial, and solved all the difficulties and problems in a month.

In addition, the first instance lasted from Saturday to Sunday. The first instance was declared on Saturday, and the procuratorate and the court also sacrificed their normal rest time.

Li Yizhong appraise the implementation of responsibility investigation in recent years. Generally speaking, it is not bad, but there are some problems in some locality and a few places.

Some of them have been punished by Party discipline and government, but they have not been implemented or changed, or announced, but not into archives.

In investigating the criminal responsibility, it is shown that the sentence of the actual sentence has been sentenced to virtual punishment, which has been lightly judged and even covered.

In October this year, with the approval of the State Council, the following coordination mechanism for serious accident accountability was established, which was led by the Ministry of supervision, the Ministry of public security, the Supreme People's court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of justice and the General Administration of work safety.

At the first joint meeting, Chen Changzhi, Vice Minister of the Ministry of supervision, said that we should refine the system of criminal responsibility investigation for production safety accidents, and establish a system of mutual accountability between Party discipline, government accountability and administrative penalties, so as to avoid gaps or disjointed in the process of accountability, and deal with the responsible persons seriously according to the law, and firmly carry out the responsibility investigation.

In November 22, 2006, the Provisional Regulations on disciplinary actions against violation of discipline in the field of production safety were promulgated and implemented. In December 20th of this year, the interpretation of several issues concerning the disciplinary act of the Communist Party of China in the field of safety in production was promulgated and implemented. The Interim Provisions, the interpretation and the regulations of the State Council on administrative accountability for extraordinarily serious accidents, the production safety accident report and investigation and handling regulations, and the amendments to the criminal law (six), as well as the judicial interpretation of the high law and the Supreme Procuratorate on handling criminal cases involving endangering mining safety, constitute the legal system of safety production accountability, which conforms to China's national conditions, including Party discipline, administrative discipline, administrative punishment and criminal treatment.

Facts have proved that, because local officials "do not pay attention to, do not take the initiative", the system and even the law can only exist in name only.

The "Qitaihe case" shows that some local officials still have chronic diseases and need treatment.