Entrepreneurship: We Must Be The Number One Leader.

There are so many people who start businesses all over the world, but they are not the ones who want to be "leaders".

In fact, we do not need everyone to be "leaders".

Some of you must do what you want to do. If you don't do something wrong, it will be a bad thing. For example, Sun Zhongshan is too modest.

Sometimes you have to learn to give up the initiative voluntarily, for example, Xiang Yu, to be the leader of Chu state, to destroy his own affairs, to ruin the great plans of the great Chu and become the jokes of the world.

It is said that during the Three Kingdoms period, Liu Bei and Wei and Wu stood in tripartite confrontation.

Liu Bei is nothing more than a straw sandal. Wen Bi is just like Zhuge Kongming. Wu Bi doesn't pass through Zhang, but he is always "big brother" and always "boss".

This is because Liu Bei will be a man and he will figure out.

I don't think so!

If Zhuge Kongming and Guan were born again, today, I am afraid that Zhuge Kongming and Guan Zhang will not regret being a little brother. If they are combined again in today's China, I am afraid this combination is still.

The reason is definitely not just what a man can do.

Similarly, Mao Zhou Zhu's leaders set up the new China. If they are human beings, Zhou Zhu is better than Mao.

Why did Mao become the "leader"?

In fact, being a leader is definitely not a good job, especially a big leader.

The qualities to be a leader are as follows: 1. advanced ideas, superb wisdom, and extraordinary insight. Leaders must have goals that others can't raise. You have to have brothers who are willing to follow the grand blueprint that you are willing to follow.

So is Mao. So is Liu Bei.

Leadership is philosophy, not others.

The above two points are the real reasons why ordinary people can not lead.

Ordinary people generally do not have lofty ideals, no advanced philosophy of life, even ambitious and vulgar.

This kind of personnel thinks of himself and everything plans for himself. How can he serve the public?

Even if they can do something, they will never be able to do anything, because they will cause conflicts of interest all the time. If they have a good situation, they will be ruined by their selfishness. How can they lead them towards a lofty goal?

The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom is the best example.

In fact, the real undertakings do not care who is the leader. If he can put forward the advanced ideas, he will have a large group of followers, and their broad mind can ensure the concerted efforts of all of them, and there will be no internal struggle for power struggles.

However, those who are the second in command, the three leaders...

Every one is successful. No one feels like he is losing money.

The more advanced organizations have advanced ideas, the greater the group business, the smaller the internal contradictions, the best we can do, each gain, no one or few complaints, like Microsoft, the world's first management level, Bill?

Gates did not shout to be the top leader. Not many people in the company felt that their level was not played, nor did anyone call it unfair. It was unfair. Everyone was very happy, so the company of others could be the number one in the world.

Our China is just too short of such a leader figure, often not without advanced ideas, lack of broad mind, and more vulgar selfishness. Therefore, China's state-owned enterprises are not big enough, and private enterprises are not strong enough.

China's culture for thousands of years has many things worth learning.

Even in this materialistic society, it is not necessary for everyone to worship money. We should face our wealth road with a calm mind.

Confucius's disciple Zi Lu can reduce his material desire to "one food, one drink". What he pursues is greater goal. In today's society, money has become the only pursuit of men, women and children.

Of course, I am not saying that everyone should not pursue materialism, but too pure material desire often loses people's mind.

The best way is to pursue a concept and pursue a goal in a long way to meet the characteristics of our wealth. This way of life is full and wonderful. It has nothing to do with being a leader.

It is horrible and unrealistic to live in a society where everyone is a leader.

If you can live in an advanced group, you will not be the same as a leader. If you are a leader in an ignorant group, how can you face it?