Do You Refuse To Start A Business When The Enterprise Is Torn Off Under The Haze?

The heavy weather is still maintained under adverse weather conditions.

During the special law enforcement inspection of the heavy pollution weather during the new year's day of the Ministry of environmental protection, there were individual enterprises who had been allowed to produce and tear off seals and other acts, in violation of the provisions of the stop production.

In response to the above problems, the inspection teams have urged local governments and relevant departments to further investigate and deal with them seriously, and implement the rectification requirements as soon as possible.

The practice of enterprises is undoubtedly a violation of the law, but enterprises tear up the seal to start without authorization, is it illegal for workers to carry out production according to the requirements of enterprises?

If workers do not carry out production according to the requirements, is it absenteeism or violation of discipline?

Most of the netizens are reluctant to participate in the work if they know that there is a violation of the law.

However, some netizens say that work is for life, and often involuntarily.

Experts say that enterprises are illegal and workers are forced to start production under pressure and should not be held liable.

When haze is becoming an important part of life, the environment under the dome is everyone's responsibility.

Nowadays, during the enforcement of the inspection department of the Ministry of environmental protection, individual enterprises ignore the special law enforcement inspection and tear up the production of the seals without authorization. It is undoubtedly irresponsible for the whole society and environment. It also violates the relevant provisions of the newly revised environmental protection law of the People's Republic of China and the law of the People's Republic of China on the prevention and control of atmospheric pollution.

It is noteworthy that in the process of illegal production, employees are always in a more awkward situation: one is the existing one.

On the other hand, it is from the requirement of the labor contract. How can the trade unions choose between the two?

17% of respondents said they would continue to work when they knew there was a violation of the law, and 52% of respondents said they would not continue to work. Another 30% said they were not clear.

Among respondents who said they would refuse to work, protecting the environment became their common goal.

A netizen's message represents the view of most supporters: anyway, people's living environment and health are the most important.

The shutting down enterprises will shut down and punish enterprises more severely. We really need to develop the economy, but we must not pollute the environment.

But though the air

The hearts of many netizens and environmental protection have become the consensus of more and more people.

But a netizen named "tomorrow sees me" tells the frustration of the employees of the enterprises: "although workers and workers have protection of their rights and interests in the enterprises, although they have national laws and trade unions, they will still act as weak members in order to survive. In order to live, they can only choose to continue their work."

It is precisely because of this "for life" reasons that many netizens have chosen to remain silent, even if they know that enterprises have irregular behaviors, they will continue to work.

Tang Yi believed that the enterprises started the work without permission when they stopped production and limited production, violating the relevant laws and regulations.

In recent years, there are not only laws and regulations at the national level, but also local laws and regulations related to environmental protection.

According to these laws and regulations, the main body of legal liability for production discontinued and limited production is enterprises, and workers should not be held responsible under pressure.

At the same time, if the workers do not carry out production according to the requirements of the enterprises under the above circumstances, they are subject to the provisions of the law and refuse to start work.

In the case of knowing whether the enterprise violates the law or not, does the employee have the courage to report the business? This survey shows that 60% of the respondents said they were willing to report the business, 21% of the respondents explicitly refused, and 17% of the respondents were hesitant.

The reason for this result is undoubtedly related to the consequences of the report. This newspaper has conducted an investigation and report on the issue of "deep throat" dismissal of enterprise employees.

It can be said that reporting enterprise violation requires not only courage but also strategy.

In the face of illegal business activities, 26% of respondents said they would consider reporting, 30% of respondents first thought of the trade union organizations of enterprises, 8% of respondents thought that refusing to work was the biggest protest, and even employees' messages indicated that they would show their attitude by resigning, and 4% of the respondents wanted to negotiate with enterprises to find a solution.

Zhang Jian, who once reported the potential safety hazard of enterprises, said the communication method is very important.

"At that time, I didn't think much about it. I found that the company had a direct violation of the operation. It was directly reflected to the boss. I didn't expect it to be a piece of paper."

In this regard, Tang Yi lawyers suggested that when workers encounter such situations, we should pay attention to leaving corresponding evidence and materials. In case of unfair treatment of enterprises, they can take legal weapons to protect themselves.

For more information, please pay attention to the world clothing shoes and hats and Internet cafes.