How To Avoid Delusion Of Workplace Delusion

It is necessary for us to understand the following three types of misunderstandings: an interpretation of the excessive personalization of communication.

Cramer said: "when there is a bad situation, people will associate themselves with their own experiences, and carry out the" right seats ", which is called" bite by a snake "for ten years.

For example, when a participant's invitation is not received, the reason may be imagined as "they decided to shut me out after discussion."

Malicious attribution negligence.

Cramer said: "we usually doubt the good deeds.

Many people have encountered the following situations.

I sent an email to my boss, but I didn't get an immediate reply.

So I began to think about the reasons.

Were they angry with me, or did I disappoint them? Did they punish it as a punishment? In fact, the boss might just be too busy to read the mail.

Exaggerating conspiracy theories.

Cramer said: "in essence, it is more like a universal social behavior.

The parties realized that their colleagues did not reply to their own letters, and then did not reply to their superiors. All of a sudden, these factors were related. The client realized, "Oh, it seems that there is no hope of promotion."

So how to keep healthy

"At the same time, let your doubts not get out of control," Cramer said. "After understanding the nature of these prejudices and the psychological factors that can exacerbate these prejudices, people can begin to take measures to deal with them.

In a sense, we are eager to help the brain make rational decisions by understanding some of the brain's mistakes.

Cramer provided the following strategies against prejudice to avoid suspicious situations: pay attention to the influence of status.

Cramer said that those with less or less resources are prone to excessive alertness, a psychological factor that can exacerbate misunderstandings.

"Lower status groups tend to remain vigilant against any evidence supporting their skepticism, because once problems arise, they will suffer heavy losses."

For example, in Cramer, about graduate students and

In the survey, he found that graduate students are worried about whether their relationship with teachers is good enough.

He said, "however, it is expected that all the staff members are thinking about their superiors, not those of lower status."

Cramer said, if you feel that you have reached a conclusion on something, try to prove that you are wrong.

There is a whole set of studies showing that people tend to collect definite evidence that supports their own conclusions while rejecting other information.

"This is natural, but it is more rational to try to collect unbiased data, including information that may be inconsistent with one's own view," he said. "Scientists and doctors have received professional training in this area."

In the process of questioning his own conclusions, one of the tasks is to be different from others.

Experts exchange.

Cramer said: "conspiracy theorists tend to go to the websites they approve, and then share information with people who share the same idea."

But if people often reassess the facts, the probability of getting the right conclusions is greater.

He said: "understanding the counter argument has its merits."

Cramer said that if the doubt is buried in the bottom of his heart or shared among only a few friends with similar ideas, it will only encourage suspicion.

After studying the suspicious mood of his leadership, he discovered a common problem among leaders: they are surrounded by yes men.

This is particularly acute in the US Presidents such as Nixon and Johnson.

"The important thing is to ensure that we can get comprehensive information.

People have to look at their social circle -- is it really good for you?